Background of the Dispute
The issue of how software fees are taxed under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) has been a long-debated subject in India. The Karnataka High Court recently addressed one such dispute between the Revenue Department and an assessee involving the India-UAE DTAA. At the heart of the matter was whether payments received as software fees could be classified as “royalty” and taxed accordingly.
This case emerged as part of a broader conversation about how digital transactions and cross-border licensing arrangements are to be treated in the modern tax landscape. With the increasing globalisation of services, software licensing has become central to international business. Naturally, it has also attracted the attention of tax authorities.
The Core Question Before the Court
The primary question raised was whether the fees received by a UAE-based entity for providing software to an Indian company could be treated as “royalty” under the India-UAE DTAA. If such payments were indeed classified as royalty, they would be taxable in India. If not, the income would be exempt under the provisions of the treaty, provided the assessee did not have a permanent establishment in India.
This issue had already been the subject of multiple litigations across the country, leading to conflicting judgments. Some courts treated software payments as royalty due to the right of use of copyright embedded in the transaction, while others considered it as a mere sale or license of a copyrighted article, not attracting royalty provisions.
The Role of the Assessing Officer
In this particular case, the Assessing Officer (AO) examined the nature of the transaction and ultimately held that the receipts were in the nature of royalty. According to the AO, the software fee was not just a payment for a product but for the right to use intellectual property embedded within the software.
However, the interpretation of what constitutes royalty under the DTAA was not straightforward. The assessee argued that the transaction only involved providing a copyrighted article, and not the copyright itself. Therefore, it could not be classified as royalty.
The Assessee’s Stand
The UAE-based assessee contended that the software in question was sold or licensed merely for operational use by the Indian entity, without conferring any right over the underlying copyright. It stressed that the buyer could not reproduce, alter, or commercially exploit the software beyond its intended use.
The assessee further pointed out that under the India-UAE DTAA, royalty has been distinctly defined, and the present transaction did not fall within that definition. The fees received were for facilitating business operations of the Indian company and did not qualify as royalty under international taxation principles.
Revenue’s Argument
The Revenue Department, on the other hand, maintained that the consideration received clearly fell within the meaning of royalty. They highlighted that software cannot be equated to ordinary goods or commodities, as it contains intellectual property rights. According to the Revenue, the transfer of rights to use software inherently involves royalty, regardless of the limited scope of usage.
The department further argued that India’s domestic law treats such payments as royalty, and therefore, taxation should follow that principle even under the DTAA.
Judicial Interpretation and Precedents
The High Court acknowledged that the matter of software taxation has been controversial across jurisdictions. Previous rulings by the Supreme Court and various High Courts have played a crucial role in shaping the interpretation of what constitutes royalty.
One landmark precedent is the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd., where it was held that payments for software cannot automatically be treated as royalty, especially when there is no transfer of copyright. This ruling gave strong support to the assessee’s position in the present case.
The Karnataka High Court’s Observations
While hearing the matter, the Karnataka High Court observed that the legal landscape had already been clarified by the Supreme Court. Since the apex court had provided detailed guidelines on how software payments should be treated, the High Court did not see the need for prolonged litigation.
The court noted that the AO had treated the receipts as royalty, but in light of higher judicial precedents and the provisions of the DTAA, the issue had already been settled. It was therefore unnecessary to delve further into a matter where clarity already existed at the national level.
Disposing of the Revenue’s Appeal
Ultimately, the Karnataka High Court disposed of the Revenue Department’s appeal. This decision brought relief to the assessee and reaffirmed the principle that software fees cannot be mechanically classified as royalty without a detailed examination of the transaction’s nature.
The court emphasised the importance of interpreting DTAAs in line with international standards and judicial consistency. Since the India-UAE DTAA specifically outlines what constitutes royalty, the High Court upheld the importance of treaty protection and taxpayer certainty.
Broader Implications for Businesses
This ruling is particularly significant for multinational businesses operating across India and the UAE. By clarifying that software fees may not always fall under the category of royalty, the judgment provides a more stable and predictable tax environment.
It sends a strong message that Indian courts are willing to align with international tax principles rather than imposing unilateral interpretations that may discourage foreign investment. Businesses can now structure their licensing and software agreements with greater confidence, knowing that judicial precedents are supportive of fair treatment.
Importance of the India-UAE DTAA
The India-UAE DTAA is a crucial instrument in strengthening bilateral trade and investment. With the UAE emerging as a global hub for technology and finance, this treaty plays an important role in avoiding double taxation and ensuring smooth cross-border transactions.
By reinforcing the treaty’s spirit, the Karnataka High Court has helped nurture stronger commercial ties between the two nations. For businesses operating in the digital economy, this case highlights the benefits of relying on treaty protection while engaging in international trade.
Balancing Domestic Law and International Treaties
A major takeaway from this case is the balance between domestic tax laws and international treaties. While Indian tax authorities often rely on domestic law to categorise income, courts have reiterated that DTAAs must prevail in case of conflict.
This ensures that taxpayers are not subject to double taxation or inconsistent treatment. It also upholds India’s commitment to honouring international agreements, a key factor in maintaining its credibility as a global business destination.
Moving Towards Greater Tax Certainty
With this judgment, Indian jurisprudence is moving closer to establishing greater tax certainty in the digital and technology sector. The IT industry, which heavily depends on software licensing and cross-border collaborations, will particularly benefit from such clarity.
The decision also reduces the compliance burden on companies that often face prolonged disputes with tax authorities. By following the guidance of the Supreme Court and respecting treaty obligations, courts are helping create a more business-friendly tax environment.
Final Thoughts
The Karnataka High Court’s decision to dispose of the Revenue’s appeal in the software fee case under the India-UAE DTAA is a step in the right direction. It reinforces judicial consistency, honours international commitments, and offers much-needed clarity to businesses engaged in cross-border software transactions.
As India continues to strengthen its digital economy and expand its global trade relationships, such judgments build trust and provide a strong foundation for sustainable growth. For taxpayers, it is a reassuring signal that fairness and transparency are guiding principles in the country’s tax system.
Do follow UAE Stories on Instagram
Indian Drone Stock Hits Upper Circuit After UAE Defence Breakthrough
